Head Graphene Xt Prestige Mp Racquet Customers Reviews

Our team was delighted to observe a large sweetspot and forgiving response as they began drilling with the Graphene 360+ Prestige Midplus from the baseline. Chris started the playtest on a positive note, saying, "The true 98-square-inch head size offered easier admission to depth and pace. The sweetspot felt very generous, and it was an easy transition from my Tecnifibre TF40 305. The racquet had a smooth, plush feel, and I felt very connected to my shots. This racquet felt crisper than the previous Prestige MP because the connection was withal there, but I was getting more than pace. I loved hitting my backhand slice with this racquet and felt I could place the brawl exactly where I wanted. I as well had excellent control on my topspin shots, so no complaints from me here!"

Compared to previous versions of the Prestige Midplus, Troy felt that this update was the virtually forgiving from the baseline. He described, "This Graphene 360+ version has the largest sweetspot, and It was relatively spin-friendly for an 18x20 design. This is likewise the first time that the Prestige Midplus has a true 98-square-inch caput size, and so maybe that's why it was more forgiving off the ground. Hit this racquet next to the Mid version, I noticed it felt more maneuverable, or 'whippy' every bit we would say. Although this Graphene 360+ Prestige Midplus felt rather light to me, information technology still provided a good amount of stability on contact. I found that if the ball was hit hard and deep at me I could block it back finer without much attempt. My backhand slice felt nice and smooth on contact, and I could control the ball with ease. The downside for me was that I wanted a flake more plow through. I think that with a slight increment in swingweight (up to nigh 330), this racquet would have that extra bit of power to help me striking my groundstrokes with some added step."

"I played well with this racquet; it has a like vibe to the Prestige Pro for me but with more than directional control and precision," said Michelle. "Even with the tighter string pattern, I found easy depth and good spin. The racquet swung fast and was very maneuverable. Similar to the Prestige Pro, I found I could defend well and gain command over the court the longer the rallies went. Transitioning from crime to defense was easy. Similar to Troy, I can always apply more plow through, but honestly, I felt like this racquet provided a heavy ball with much more than ease than some of my heftier racquets. My opponents mentioned that I pushed them dorsum well; again, it was easier to do that with this racquet in manus compared to my heavier racquet of choice. This racquet felt like it had a large, forgiving sweetspot, and I appreciated that. It was also stable on mishits or balls that came fast or deep."

Marker's playtest started a bit rockier than the others, but he got his setup figured out and and so truly put the racquet to the examination. He said, "The start groundstrokes I hit with Head's latest refinement of the Prestige Midplus were non my all-time. The grip size was a four 1/4, and it was strung with a circular, smoothen polyester, which is not my favorite combination. In one case I found another hitter with a 4 3/viii grip size and applied one of my favorite gear-shaped polyesters (Head Lynx Edge), I was expert to become! From my first swing with that setup, I felt right at domicile gauging my shots and aiming toward smaller targets on the courtroom. Past hour 2 I had concluded that this was the all-time Prestige Midplus I have swung to date. This new update made executing everything from topspin baseline exchanges to crafty angles and bear upon shots a bit easier compared to prior versions of the frame."

The Graphene 360+ Prestige Midplus' large sweetspot and stable feel worked in our team'southward favor at cyberspace. As he moved forward into the courtroom, Chris continued to notice a connexion with this racquet. He said, "I loved the corporeality of affect I had on the ball. Whether I was hitting a drib volley or punching a volley deep, I felt very confident with this racquet in my hands. I was also able to dial high volleys with enough pace to ensure they didn't come up back."

Much like her experience testing other racquets in this line, Michelle found the Graphene 360+ Prestige Midplus provided a stable response at the net. She said, "I could stab at volleys I barely reached and have no trouble making a play to get myself back into the court. This racquet got into position easily and held up against the biggest of hitters on our squad."

The same traits that enabled Marker to play effectively from the backcourt likewise boosted his confidence when he was closer to the cyberspace. He explained, "The thinner axle contour, combined with the slight increase in head size, provided me with positive feedback. The 18x20 design held the ball on my strings long plenty for me to execute a good volley, even when contact was non spot on."

One of Troy'south biggest knocks on some of the previous Graphene iterations of the Prestige MP was that the sweetspot was relatively small. He said, "This update offered a bigger sweetspot, and I found it to feel more than stable against hard hitters. I could dispense the racquet with ease, especially when I was stretched out or off residuum. I wasn't finding a ton of gratuitous put-away power, but I was able to generate easier depth than I recollect from the previous version. I wasn't finding as much precision as I did with the Mid version, but the control and feel were right up in that location with the Yonex VCORE Pro 97 (310) and Dunlop Srixon CX 200."

Our team felt like they could effectively execute serves with the Graphene 360+ Prestige Midplus. Troy plant good command over the brawl when starting the point. He said, "Although I wasn't feeling as precise as I did with the Head Graphene 360+ Prestige Mid, I did relish a little more power in comparison. I call back that the combination of the generous sweetspot and easy maneuverability allowed me to generate more ability than expected. The power didn't come up as easily as it does with my Yonex EZONE 98+, but it was more than I would have thought coming from a thin-axle, 98-square-inch head size and 18x20 pattern. My favorite serve to hitting with this racquet was the flat outset serve downward the middle. I could generate decent footstep and place the brawl accurately. I felt competent when striking my piece and kick serves, but I wasn't every bit constructive with this racquet as I was with the Graphene 360+ Prestige Pro."

As long as this frame was matched with a profiled polyester string, Mark felt confident when stepping up to the line to serve. He said, "While this racquet was non a game-changer for my serve, I could switch seamlessly from the serve to a groundstroke or volley, which is sometimes an effect I have with other racquets."

Michelle was happy to notice a good amount of pop on her serves. She said, "I felt really dialed in with my targets and could boom the T serve consistently on either side. Despite the tighter design, I still got enough grip on the brawl to go my second serves moving. We did string it up with Lynx Edge at one betoken, which was a groovy philharmonic. The racquet loaded speedily, and I didn't feel at all limited with serves."

The control-oriented characteristics of this racquet supplied the precision Chris needed to benefit from a well-struck serve with pinpoint accuracy. He described, "I got similar pace on the ball as I practice with my racquet of option. The ability level fell in line with what I would expect from a midplus player's racquet with an 18x20 string design. I liked the fashion the racquet felt through my swing, and it was pretty maneuverable. I was besides able to become ample spin to go my more aggressive serves to drop inside the box, which gave me some nice margin for error."

The Graphene 360+ Prestige Midplus gave our playtesters all the control they needed to return with confidence. Chris loved information technology and said, "I liked the added power I constitute compared to the previous version, and information technology gave me more options in tough situations. In that location was nevertheless tons of control, and I was able to find my targets on both aggressive swings and block returns."

As Troy noticed on groundstrokes, this update was much more than forgiving than previous iterations on his returns. He said, "The combination of an ample sweetspot and easy maneuverability made it piece of cake for me to be aggressive on returns. If I had the time to accept a swing at the ball, I could hit deep and precisely place the brawl nearly the corners, making it tough on my opponents. When I was stretched out or off-residual, I establish enough maneuverability to at to the lowest degree lob the return back deep in the court. In that location was decent stability on contact confronting some of the bigger servers I faced, just I would have preferred a flake more than mass in the head of the racquet to boost the stability and plowthrough. I found cracking control and feel when I needed to slice my backhand return, but once again, a petty more mass would aid add together some depth to that shot."

This is the part of the playtest where Michelle had a tiny gripe, but she found it to exist an easy gear up. She explained, "At times, especially off second serves, the racquet came through too fast for me, and I missed my target. I tend to swing fast on returns, especially those juicy second serves that sit down up in my strike zone. I could easily run across myself calculation some weight to deadening the racquet downwardly a fleck and then I can be more explosive."

"Even with regards to my return of serve, which has never struck fearfulness in other players, I would say the combination of specs for the Graphene 360+ Prestige Midplus really made returning serve easier for me," added Mark. "I near often endeavor to chip the serve back deep to the centre of the court for singles, and this update to the Prestige Midplus catered to this approach nicely."

wilsonweververnly.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.tenniswarehouse-europe.com/learning_center/racquet_reviews/HPRMPRreview.html

Share this post